Author Topic: Local Government Ombudsman Causes Council to Refund £11,600 in Parking Fines  (Read 2041 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Nigel W

  • Guest
Maybe this is another route to go down to cause Councils to refund unlawful penalties.

Parking fine refunds after Cherwell District Council error
BBC News Oxford

The council will repay £11,600
worth of fines after the ombudsman's ruling

Residents in Oxfordshire are to be refunded £11,600 worth of parking fines after a council failed to properly signpost new charges.

The Local Government Ombudsman (LGO) found Cherwell District Council had not
acted "reasonably" over new rules it introduced last April.

A council spokesman said the authority did not agree with the findings.
But the council said it would repay all fines issued in the nine days in April when adequate signs were not in place.

Dr Jane Martin, from the LGO, which upheld five complaints, said: "In this case I found that there was indeed unfairness, the council did not act reasonably.'

'Above Legal Requirements.'
"It was not at all fair in my view that the onus was on the complainant to check when they'd been used to not paying charges in the past."
Councillor Barry Wood said: "We are disappointed with the findings.
"This authority went over and above the legal requirements to ensure that changes to parking charges were communicated well in advance of implementation.
 "In recognition of a high level of [fines] issued during the first two weeks of the changes, we introduced additional signage, as well as writing to every Blue Badge holder in the district informing them of the changes."

The council said it has the details of those affected in the district between 4 and 13 April last year and will contact them directly to repay the fines.
« Last Edit: 02 April, 2012, 06:32:15 AM by Nigel W »

Offline Ewan Hoosami

  • Administrator
  • Follower
  • *****
  • Posts: 2227
  • Veni, Vidi, $chunti. I came, I saw, I assisted.
That's a good find and it has Newham forecourt parking written all over it. What a surprise that the council did not agree with the findings. They're normally open to reasonable argument.

Appealing to the council is like playing chess with a pigeon. You might be a chess grand master but the pigeon will always knock all the pieces over, shit on the board and then strut around triumphantly.

Offline Pat Pending

  • Global Moderator
  • Follower
  • *****
  • Posts: 2504
I think it has Moor End Road HH stamped all the way through it like a stick of rock :idea:
Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well-preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways - Beer in one hand - chocolate in the other - body thoroughly used up,  totally worn out and screaming "WOO-HOO, what a  ride!!"

Offline Ewan Hoosami

  • Administrator
  • Follower
  • *****
  • Posts: 2227
  • Veni, Vidi, $chunti. I came, I saw, I assisted.
Very droll pat. You know that's a completely hypothetical situation.

Appealing to the council is like playing chess with a pigeon. You might be a chess grand master but the pigeon will always knock all the pieces over, shit on the board and then strut around triumphantly.

Offline The Phoenix

  • Follower
  • **
  • Posts: 115
Moor End Road decision by the lady herself:  Case Number QA 05111E  30th March 2012.
The Patas Monkey has a remarkably high reproductive rate, perhaps as an evolutionary response to the high adult mortality rates associated with this strongly terrestrial lifestyle.  Not to be confused with the Patas Adjudicator - a species yet to be studied.  Use extreme caution: it's  unpredictable

Nigel W

  • Guest
Attached is a copy of an Adjudication for Moor End Road Bus Gate in January of this year.

 


Supporters of the NoToMob

In order to view this object you need Flash Player 9+ support!

Get Adobe Flash player