Author Topic: ParkingEye -v- Beavis & Wardley - Prankster's guide on how to combat judgment  (Read 7016 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline The Bald Eagle

  • Administrator
  • Follower
  • *****
  • Posts: 4398
  • THE lowest common denominator
Judgment of HHJ Maloney in case of ParkingEye -v- Beavis & Wardley


http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2014/06/arguments-to-use-if-parkingeye-try-and.html

IN THE COUNTY COURT AT CAMBRIDGE Claims Nos 3JD05152 / 3DJ05169

HHJ MOLONEY QC

PARKING EYE LIMITED      Claimant

And

BARRY BEAVIS                 Defendant (Claim-152)

MARTIN WARDLEY             Defendant (Claim-169)

http://nebula.wsimg.com/8bc2fd992ffc9ff3697c488fd4583721?AccessKeyId=4CB8F2392A09CF228A46&disposition=0&alloworigin=1
WE ARE WATCHING YOU

Offline The Bald Eagle

  • Administrator
  • Follower
  • *****
  • Posts: 4398
  • THE lowest common denominator
This is currently under review by the Prankster following the Appeal Court decision.
WE ARE WATCHING YOU