Author Topic: Gladstones solicitors get special mention in House of Commons debate  (Read 239 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline The Bald Eagle

  • Administrator
  • Follower
  • *****
  • Posts: 4263
  • THE lowest common denominator
During the second reading of the Parking (Code of Practice) bill in the House of Commons today, one of the MPs (whose name I didn't catch) called for an investigation into the incestuous relationship between Gladstones solicitors and IPC Ltd, something the Parking Prankster has campaigned on for a considerable time now.

I bet he's a very happy Pranky at the moment. ;D

Gladstones, you've been Pranked.




http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2018/01/link-parking-youve-been-gladstoned.html
WE ARE WATCHING YOU

Offline The Bald Eagle

  • Administrator
  • Follower
  • *****
  • Posts: 4263
  • THE lowest common denominator
Re: Gladstones solicitors get special mention in House of Commons debate
« Reply #1 on: 04 February, 2018, 11:08:28 AM »
Quote from Hansard

==================================


Stephen Doughty

I am glad to hear that the Minister supports the Bill. Will he also look closely at the links between one of the so-called trade associations, the International Parking Community, and Gladstones Solicitors, and the listing of all these accredited operators? It is clear from Companies House information that there are clear links between the individual directors of Gladstones and the IPC, which goes under United Trade and Industry Ltd, and that there has been a repeated changing of names and addresses in an attempt to cover up these links.

==============================

Here's another one I particularly liked, courtesy of Pete Wishart MP

==============================


"Self-regulation has obviously failed dramatically. The British Parking Association is as much use as a multi-storey car park in the middle of [the] Gobi desert. The parking cowboys hide behind BPA membership to give a veneer of legitimacy. Every time I take up issues with Smart Parking, it just comes back to me and says, “We’re members of the BPA so it should be all right.”"

 :pmsl:

==============================

Here's the appropriate link to Hansard where Pete Wishart's wonderful put down is now and forever enshrined.

All hail Pete.
<Kneelsuckers>

https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2018-02-02/debates/CC84AF5E-AC6E-4E14-81B1-066E6A892807/Parking(CodeOfPractice)Bill
WE ARE WATCHING YOU

Offline The Bald Eagle

  • Administrator
  • Follower
  • *****
  • Posts: 4263
  • THE lowest common denominator
Re: Gladstones solicitors get special mention in House of Commons debate
« Reply #2 on: 04 February, 2018, 11:35:48 AM »
You can watch the whole thing here

=================================



http://parliamentlive.tv/event/index/2f0384f2-eba5-4fff-ab07-cf24b6a22918?in=12:49:50
WE ARE WATCHING YOU

Offline BGB

  • Follower
  • **
  • Posts: 654
Re: Gladstones solicitors get special mention in House of Commons debate
« Reply #3 on: 04 February, 2018, 09:28:41 PM »
...and in writing here.

https://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2018-02-02a.1149.0&p=24802

I'm glad that Pete Wishart understands the situation.  He states that:

"Self-regulation has obviously failed dramatically. The British Parking Association is as much use as a multi-storey car park in the middle of Gobi desert.  :pmsl: The parking cowboys hide behind BPA membership to give a veneer of legitimacy. Every time I take up issues with Smart Parking, it just comes back to me and says, “We’re members of the BPA so it should be all right.”

 


Supporters of the NoToMob

In order to view this object you need Flash Player 9+ support!

Get Adobe Flash player