Would love to see the written reasons for this. Note that the ParkingEye Ltd (ex) employee appeared in person and ParkingEye Ltd had a barrister. They must have done something very naughty for the Judge to find in favour of a litigant in person. Case No: 2401419/2020
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Claimant: Mr M Dodgson
Respondent: Parking Eye Ltd
Heard at: Liverpool On: 21 & 22 July 2021
Before: Employment Judge Ord
Representation:
Claimant: In Person
Respondent: Ms Amy Smith (Counsel)
JUDGMENT1. The claimant’s complaint of unfair dismissal is not well-founded and is dismissed.
2. The claimant’s complaint of wrongful dismissal is well-founded.
3. With respect to the claim of wrongful dismissal, the respondent is ordered to pay the claimant the net sum of £5,464.44 (consisting of £455.37 net per week for 12 weeks). The respondent will be responsible for all legal obligations on the payment._____________________________
Employment Judge Liz Ord
Date 22 July 2021
Case No: 2401419/2020
JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 23 July 2021
FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE
Notes
1. Neither party objected to the hearing taking place on a remote video platform.
2. Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. If written reasons are provided, they will be displayed on the tribunal’s online register of judgments, which is visible to internet searches.
https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions/mr-m-dodgson-v-parking-eye-ltd-2401419-slash-2020